Canon 17-55 is much bigger and especially heavier, you will notice that instantly. I highly recommend proper self-testing before buying, after that Ive decided it is not worth the money. Choosing basic zoom for APS-C or DX is a nightmare, unfortunate [Read more...] posted in 2011 in review

Canon 17-55 is much bigger and especially heavier, you will notice that instantly. I highly recommend proper self-testing before buying, after that Ive decided it is not worth the money. Choosing basic zoom for APS-C or DX is a nightmare, unfortunately all are somehow crippled. I have the same problem now :( posted in 2011 in review

You will struggle to get better zoom then Tamron 17-50/2,8 - Caon 17-55 is marginally better but much more heavy and expensive and in my opinion its price/weight/performance ratio is quite poor. EF-S 10-22 is nothing exceptional, except its quite overpri [Read more...] posted in 2011 in review

You will struggle to get better zoom then Tamron 17-50/2,8 - Caon 17-55 is marginally better but much more heavy and expensive and in my opinion its price/weight/performance ratio is quite poor. EF-S 10-22 is nothing exceptional, except its quite overpriced. My choice would be Sigma 8-16 and Sigma 24-70/2,8 macro which are both superior. The problem is hole between 16-24mm :( posted in 2011 in review