Contact us via email or phoneEmail us | Phone: +1 615-771-5611
Login  Password Login
categories
designers area
photographers area
resources
photo map
free photos
dreamstime blogs
Dreamfinder - advanced serch
 
  | Reset search
  | Content filter   
 
Exclude keyword(s):
Exclude contributor:
Only from contributor:
Image price: Low()
High()
Image license: I-EL W-EL P-EL SR-EL
At
Secondary Color:
At
Resolution:  
min.
max.
 
Color:
 
Orientation:
 
Model properties:
Gender:  
Number of models:
 
Age group: (all | none)
 
Ethnicity: (all | none)
Basic search:
Match all, Match any, RF, Editorial, Exclusive, With people, New search, Within results, ...portfolio/ category/ collection, In previous results, Memorize search options
Advanced search:
Exclude keywords, Exclude contributor, Only from contributor, Price, License, Resolution, Color, Among my favorites, Orientation, Model properties, Primary Color, Secondary Color
Click the links for information.
 
Results area:
image price level
report image for bad keywords

add image to lightbox

 
Lightbox/cart:  View & Download
You have 0 images

Home > Dreamstime Message Board > General > Avoiding Camera Shake With Shu...

 

You have to login first in order to be able to post messages.
Click here to login or register if you are a new user.

Search  

Page:
< 1 
2
 of 2
Showing posts 21 - 40 of 26

Avoiding Camera Shake With Shutter Speed

Author Message
Waldo4
11 posts
Message edited at 02/15/2008, 09:46:30 AM by Waldo4
I looks with that camera holding technique that it could benefit further from grasping a monopod or walking stick of some sort with the left arm, in addition to the holding right arm (might not work for people with little hands), especially for heavy lenses.



Whenever I HH a shot I always take at least 4-5 shots in rapid fire to find the sharpest. Shot #1 almost never is (if fact it might not ever have been), usually shot #3 or #4 is the sharpest. It depends on the FPS of the camera, but after the initial jiggle of pressing the shutter, there is a quick stable period before the effects of holding a position long term begin to introduce jiggle, with my camera and arms that works out to shot #3 or 4.
Canon Rebel XT, Canon EF 17-40 f/4L USM, Canon EF 50mm f...

Uploaded files:85 | Total Sales: 253
Maigi
2636 posts
85
Message posted at 02/15/2008, 10:06:54 AM by Maigi
Thanks, Ned and Jay! A lot of techniques to test and try, which works best. Thank you for your suggestions and links!
Canon 550D, Tamron AF 18-270mm, Canon 50mm, Wacom Intuos4 M,...

Uploaded files:2062 | Total Sales: 12836
Cuatrofb
16 posts
<10
Message posted at 04/19/2008, 13:38:18 PM by Cuatrofb
this is probably useless, but here's my take on it:

no matter what, you're camera will always be moving, its the nature of our atmosphere and physics prove it.



so lets cook up a formula



SM=B



s=shutter speed M=camera shake (movement) B=Blurriness



so the more of each initial variable, S and M, the blurrier the photo. We know that M is a positive number, since we know the camera is always moving. This means if we were calculating for a 0 blurriness photo, we would need a 0 shutterspeed, since 0 is the only number you can multiply a positive number by to equal zero. Of course, a 0 shutter speed is impossible, so the ideal is an extremely fast shutter speed, as close to zero as possible.



So in the end, you must realize that zero camera shake is impossible, since that is the core to the answer to your question... The higher the shutter speed, the faster it is, the less blurriness you will encounter, which i am guessing is your ultimate goal.





Of course, i could be completely wrong :P
Canon EOS 10D Tamron SP-AF Aspherical 28-75mm Macro 67 Sta...

Uploaded files:19 | Total Sales: 22
Maigi
2636 posts
85
Message posted at 04/19/2008, 15:01:43 PM by Maigi

Originally posted by Cuatrofb:
Quoted Message: Of course, i could be completely wrong :P


LOL

But I like the reasoning... ;)
Canon 550D, Tamron AF 18-270mm, Canon 50mm, Wacom Intuos4 M,...

Uploaded files:2062 | Total Sales: 12836
Kelpfish
90 posts
72
Message posted at 04/21/2008, 15:25:03 PM by Kelpfish
Use a bungie cord with slight tension (but not too much of course) instead of string. Then you can pan and still get some tension to help stabilize the camera.



Joe


Uploaded files:2461 | Total Sales: 6824
Pirate59
29 posts
60
Message posted at 04/22/2008, 02:28:22 AM by Pirate59
My two cents.



I find the 'sport' or multi shot idea works best for me.



resting against a object also helps heaps, but i have had situations that extra objects make it worse.



i have a few examples.



1)

Shooting some tigers at a zoo, we were standing on a wood and rope suspension bridge. naturally other people crossing this bridge caused motion. But each time i shot 4-7 images, and moved on. Overall i think i had over 300 images of tigers but i got the shots i wanted.

*Note some are currently pending so we will see if they really were any good or not =)



2)

I was at Epcot (one of the Disney Parks in Orlando) at the end of the evening and trying to cheat a 1/3 sec shot of fireworks was getting hard. The pulsing of the bass in the music made the handrail vibrate.

In reality though thats a rare situation.



There are lots of good ideas here. And i reckon that most if not all will be very useful.



It really depends of the situation
Canon EOS Rebel Xti
-----------------------------------

Uploaded files:62 | Total Sales: 72

Page:
< 1 
2
 of 2
Showing posts 21 - 40 of 26
Current Server Time: 06/03/2012, 11:06:50 AM

 
Quicksearch for stock photography: Search
  Upload image | About Us | FAQ | Contact Us | Terms of use | API / Referral program | Site map | Privacy policy | Free Stock Images
Support - phone: +1 615-771-5611, Click here to contact us

dreamstime
  Copyright © 2000-2012 Dreamstime. All rights reserved.
Dreamstime is a member of PACA and CEPIC.