You have to login first in order to be able to post messages.
Click here to login or register if you are a new user.

Removing prints

Achilles
Admin
We decided to remove the prints program announced here.



The logistical hassle and dependence on third party services made us reconsider the future of this program. It is also the reason why you didn't see too many updates. This program wasn't able to take off properly.



It's the first time we had to remove a product since our inception, 5 years ago. No matter how difficult is to withdraw features that required a lot of work, I consider such move wiser than supporting a program that proved neither able to compete with our core model nor able to help it grow. New programs need to be disruptive in order to compete with core models.



Furthermore, our customers experienced significant inconveniences and shipping delays. None of them were Dreamstime's fault, but these flaws jeopardized our image in front of customers. All these correlated with the logistical hassle and synchronization burden made it obvious that we need to remove the program as it doesn't meet our standards.



We will discontinue the product starting Dec. 15th. If you want to order, you can still do it until this date, but take into account that the items might not arrive until Christmas.



Thank you for your understanding.
Edited: 12/08/2009, 11:11:20 AM by Admin
Leaf
Thanks for the info. It is too bad it didn't work out but nice to see you are able to look at it objectively and weed out what isn't making the site better.
Canon 5D mark II + some glass
Posted: 12/08/2009, 05:12:28 AM
Melonstone
What a shame it didn't work out as it was a great idea, but you're right about pleasing customers....that is the first priority and unrealistic to continue if third parties are unable to provide service at an acceptable level. Thanks for letting us know instead of just quietly removing this feature.
CANON EOS 50D
Posted: 12/08/2009, 05:48:58 AM
Pjhpix
Shame that it didn't work, but I totally agree that its not worth persevering with something that could compromise the good image that you have established.
Professional. ...
Posted: 12/08/2009, 06:10:40 AM
Pinfoldphotos
It's good to see that you are not afraid to try these things, and also that you are not afraid to evaluate the results objectively.



Keep up the good work,



Ian.
Posted: 12/08/2009, 06:15:07 AM
Adpower99
Thank, Achilles. I'm glad DT has decided to pull this program. It had much potential, but didn't meet Dreamstime's usual high standards. I ordered a canvas print and received my order yesterday and I have to say that I was somewhat less than pleased.
mm, Sigma 105 mm macro...
Edited: 12/08/2009, 11:55:57 AM
Noonie
WHEW! Thanks for removing it if it was so badly run from their end.
Nikon and sometimes an older Olympus.
Posted: 12/08/2009, 10:03:17 AM
Titania1980
A pity it didn't work, at least you tried it... priority is make customers happy and if this program were giving so many problems better remove it
Filter Tripod...
Posted: 12/08/2009, 14:38:31 PM
Bradcalkins
It is too bad when things don't work out, but it doesn't sound like it is working out very well...
ZD 50mm Macro f/2...
Posted: 12/08/2009, 15:13:34 PM
Mani33
The important is to learn from what went wrong & to avoid it in the future!

I heard a lot about logistic problems in big companies also! So these things happen even with big names around the world! And they always stay big names!!!



Move ahead DT here we are ;)
My PC with Adobe Photoshop & Illustrator, Nikon D3100
Posted: 12/08/2009, 18:46:27 PM
Adeliepenguin
It sounds like it was a troubling decision, but the right one. I respect Dreamstime for assessing the situation quickly, and making us aware of the concerns that led to the decision. The program initially was a good idea, and I look forward to more "good" ideas from the Dreamstime team. Thanks, Achilles.
Currently my primary camera is a Fuji XT-1.
Posted: 12/08/2009, 20:40:08 PM
Wildmac
Thanks for letting us know. Shame it didn't work out, it had a lot of potential but having to rely on others to meet our standards always carries some element of risk to our good name. I applaud you for recognizing it wasn't going to work and knowing when to let it go. We'll just have to think of some other new innovations to keep us ahead of the pack. Mmm, video clips ?
Posted: 12/08/2009, 23:45:52 PM
Afagundes
Too bad it didnt work out, but a good lesson to learn for the future.



Just as a sugestion, I think it makes more sense to make a partnership with another (or others) company who is already succesfull providing this kind of services, has already managed this problems, etc...
f/4L Canon EF 70-300mm IS/USM f/4-5.6 Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM/Macro ...
Posted: 12/09/2009, 02:47:53 AM
Thefinalmiracle
No problem. Our glass can't ever remain empty in the rains of creativity, I believe that something new and innovative will come up from DT for sure.
18-55mm IS Lens & Canon 70-200 (2.8) Lens / Canon 50mm ...
Posted: 12/09/2009, 03:30:24 AM
smartview27
we knew it: it's hard to start a new product in crisis. Also, from the beginning my first question was: how soon the print will arrive to the customer? ...I didn't receive any answer, but today....
professional scanner Nikon Super Cool Scan 9000 ED, tripod, Elinchrom...
Edited: 12/09/2009, 04:02:57 AM
Bogdan
I feel very sad to hear this... I was very interested in this program...



I had received the first print a few weeks back (although with some delays of logistic nature) and ordered the second one just last weekend. I also started to recommend this feature to some friends and now I'll have to hurry them to order before the deadline or find other suppliers...



I am sure it was properly analysed, but I believe taking such a decision only 2 months after launch is premature... I would give at least 6 months...



Bogdan

www.bogdanlazar.ro
Canon EF-S 60mm/f2.8 USM Macro ¦ Canon EF-S 10-22mm/f3.5-4.5 USM ¦ ...
Edited: 12/09/2009, 15:32:44 PM
Cathysbelleimage
Thanks for the update Serban!
#filters, lensbaby, some studio lights....
Posted: 12/09/2009, 22:09:54 PM
Shootalot
It is probably better to have the customer download the file then upload to their favorite photofinisher. There are many out there. Too bad it did not work out.
lenses....
Posted: 12/10/2009, 01:23:52 AM
Ptoone
It is a shame this didn't work out, I can imagine it is not easy to implement such a process and maintain consistent high standards. I think DT should have just printed one size and kept it simple to start off. Like a 4'' x 6'' postcard. Image on the front and space to write a message on the back. Sending in the post will be reasonable and it will be much easier to manage. If the technology is there, there is always a printing machine like my illustration I did for an assignment last year. I have seen these machines in the UK so it could be done.



   Dreamstime Machine   
Scanner, Adobe Illustrator, Brushes, Pens, Olympus E510 & Nikon D80.
Posted: 12/18/2009, 08:28:17 AM