You have to login first in order to be able to post messages.
Click here to login or register if you are a new user.


Page:
1
 2 >
 of 2
Showing posts 1 - 20 of 30

So - Quark - InDesign - PageMaker - Corel - Scribus

Author Message
Nextlimits
64 posts
Message posted at 06/04/2006, 19:06:40 PM by Nextlimits
Which is ur favourite DTP creation tool and why?


Uploaded files:129 | Total Sales: 695
Nlizer
251 posts
67
Message edited at 06/04/2006, 19:35:57 PM by Nlizer
Corel X3 - because I originally started with a MAC and Pagemaker, moved to IBM format computers and Pagemaker, then to Corel with version 1.0 and have been with it ever since.



That was back when my computer cost me a bundle. Ram was $100 a meg, my single spin CD rom was $700 and my vga monitor cost me $1200. Not to mention my first color printer was $4600. Now I think of computers as disposable after those prices. For me now when it breaks it goes in the trash and I get a new one.



Oh, wait. The question was about DTP. Corel all the way for my illustration designs.



:-)
Casio EX-Z850
Canon EOS Rebel XSi
18-55 is lens

Uploaded files:394 | Total Sales: 3423
Stuartkey
1282 posts
80
Message posted at 06/05/2006, 03:54:28 AM by Stuartkey
DTP used to be ruled in the industry by Quark, but fortunately Adobe came up with InDesign as an alternative.



Any professional user will tell you that Quark used to be king for layout, but many people, me included, think InDesign is actually better.



It's also considerably cheaper.





Uploaded files:603 | Total Sales: 9131
Nextlimits
64 posts
Message posted at 06/05/2006, 04:53:51 AM by Nextlimits
I love quark - i've been using for 4 years and its great - i like Indesign also but quark is more productive


Uploaded files:129 | Total Sales: 695
Nlizer
251 posts
67
Message posted at 06/05/2006, 05:45:30 AM by Nlizer
Are you a MAC or PC user?



I do think that has bearing on what is used.



It is really what you find to be most efficient for your use.



If you have the luxury of trying several (most have trial periods now) I would try them all and see which you find to be the best for your needs.



:-)

Casio EX-Z850
Canon EOS Rebel XSi
18-55 is lens

Uploaded files:394 | Total Sales: 3423
Message posted at 06/05/2006, 11:24:15 AM by Artistic-impressions
I use to use primarily Quark Xpress but I now use InDesign. The adobe programs are completely compatible so there doesn't have to be a conversion of picture data. Meaning you don't have change your picture from .psd to .tif, or .eps (considering that you're working with photoshop) so the orginal .psd with layers, transparencies and everything is importable into the Indesign document. And there's no change in the picture the exact picture that you worked on in Photoshop is what you get in Indesign, and then later converted to .pdf for the print. I work almost extensively with pictures in my design so it's real important that the picture I work and see is what is in the layout with little to no change. Of course there's the change in color that occurs when RGB is convert to CMYK. But you learn to live with that. Quark is great and until I actually started with InDesign I thought I'ld never use a different program, and the only reason why I switched, was that my pictures (as .psd even) can be used in the orig. form from begin to print ready document.


Uploaded files:114 | Total Sales: 123
Nextlimits
64 posts
Message posted at 06/05/2006, 17:40:32 PM by Nextlimits
I've tried InDesign and i know that came from Adobe so - all files fit but the productivity from Quark can not be found anywere else. For that even Adobe took the keyboard shortcuts and placed on their InDesign. I like InDesign, dont get me wrong but Quark remains my favourite. Until i will get to know InDesign verry well i will rely on Xpress.


Uploaded files:129 | Total Sales: 695
Message posted at 06/06/2006, 04:42:34 AM by Artistic-impressions
I can't say that I'm yet as effiecient in Indesign as I once was with Quark, but I know these things take time, but at first I was like you, for pratice of fun InDesign but when something has to get done, then Quark. But then I just decided for one. ( Although they are both still installed on my computer!)


Uploaded files:114 | Total Sales: 123
Icefront
239 posts
65
Message posted at 06/07/2006, 14:49:35 PM by Icefront
Corel Draw is very flexibile. At our company (advertising material development) we use to make displays; from the technical drawing to the graphics, everything is drawn in corel. Also it is suitable to create/export toolpaths for milling/cutting.



I noticed a lot of problems printing color separations from Corel... This eats a lot of money, until you learn all the little faults.



I'm using Illustrator too, but always had problems with selecting and the curve editing. Generally what is made in 10min in Corel, it tooks 20-30 in Illustrator :(



We receive a lot of materials in ai with placed psd or tiff files. It seems that big companies exclusively use adobe products... The problem comes when DTP uses Adobe adobe and the Printing Company Corel. A lot of incompatibility problems delay the project and in many cases the only solution is the complete remake of the entire graphic.



The hardest thing is to say, which one is better. First of all, who wants to compare two things must know each of them very good.
Professional studio, lighting, Canon equipment with L-grade ...

Uploaded files:2850 | Total Sales: 11986
Ajv123ajv
648 posts
66
Message posted at 06/27/2006, 16:14:53 PM by Ajv123ajv
Quark is the best for text and brochures - by illustrator is better for graphic layouts/logo design etc with photoshop for all the image work.


Uploaded files:1144 | Total Sales: 8505
Nextlimits
64 posts
Message edited at 07/05/2006, 16:58:22 PM by Nextlimits
Damn - Quark 7 has many bugs - it crash when u dont expect - i wish it was stable lice 6.5



Still a superb program


Uploaded files:129 | Total Sales: 695
Exiledphoto
51 posts
<10
Message posted at 07/08/2006, 00:35:05 AM by Exiledphoto
Quark Xpress is alright... but the colour options are so incredibly limited.
-Nikon D50

Uploaded files:41 | Total Sales: 261
Tom911
6 posts
<10
Message posted at 07/10/2006, 18:39:59 PM by Tom911
My favorite is CorelDraw X3. Because I working on corel products since CorelDraw 1.0 and I think its very fast tool. I dont think Adobe illustrator is worst - its just harder for me change tools and start lerning from basic. I see no problem with compability - even exchange files with Illustrator in CorelDraw X3 is easy. And basic things - Corel Draw X3 is cheper then Any single product from Adobe on proffesional level but giving posibility almost like couple of softwares from adobe. Thats maks for me CorelDraw X3 seriously attractive. As creator I have no problem with acceptance of my work. If its good then its problem any agency how they can handle this work (of course I can send them in any possible format exported from CorelDraw X3)
Fuji S5 Pro, Nikkor DX 17-55mm f2.8, Nikkor 35mm f1.8

Uploaded files:351 | Total Sales: 688
S_kelsey
103 posts
61
Message posted at 08/02/2006, 14:29:41 PM by S_kelsey
InDesign by far! CS3 comes out next spring!
Canon 5D
17-35 2.8
75-300 IS 4-5.6


Uploaded files:181 | Total Sales: 1532
Rcmathiraj
172 posts
80
Message posted at 08/16/2006, 12:44:22 PM by Rcmathiraj
My vote also gone to Indesign!
Nikon D90 with 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED AF-S VR DX Nikkor Zoo...

Uploaded files:5169 | Total Sales: 29781
Toddmat
2 posts
69
Message posted at 08/24/2006, 08:15:59 AM by Toddmat
Adobe software had been with the printing industry from the Mac's beginnings in the late 80's. Quark was best for page layout but no good for anything else. Adobe's programs have become the MUST HAVE for any serious graphics professional. There is no way I'm going back to Quark. Many times, people use the term "Quark" as a weird unexplanable glitch in a program. That is what I think of Quark. I think Quark's days are numbered unless they make some serious changes.
Apple MacPro with Adobe Creative Suite

Uploaded files:0 | Total Sales: 0
Aj-brugge
29 posts
72
Message posted at 09/03/2006, 02:58:44 AM by Aj-brugge
I personally prefer Indesign over quark for layout work and I really have never had to use Quark once I got out off College with the exception of converting a file over to be used in indesign. As for why I like it, There are many but I'd like to highlight the whole compatibility with adobe products as the best one. The fact that I can place PSD and AI Files is great. As for Corel it has it's place, I used it for 2.5 years making maps, it's kind of like illustrator and indesign with some compromises and has a strong presence in printshops and sign shops as it very good prepress capabilities. Now I'll leave it at that before I start to gripe about things that have been removed that I liked.
Nikon D-5100 Adobe Creative Suite Nikon D 5100

Uploaded files:42 | Total Sales: 373
Jennifer12
12 posts
Message posted at 09/28/2006, 05:11:36 AM by Jennifer12
indesign - INdesign - INDESIGN!! I have used them all but indesign have blown them all out of the competition! My two cents anyway...


Uploaded files:0 | Total Sales: 0
Pdtnc
102 posts
70
Message posted at 12/19/2006, 01:22:36 AM by Pdtnc
InDesign - there's no contest.



its cheaper to buy the Adobe Creative Suite than to buy Quark alone! ;)
Canon EOS 400D- Sigma 10-20mm Tamron 28-75mm Lensbaby 3G ...

Uploaded files:851 | Total Sales: 3241
Susanfindlay
234 posts
60
Message posted at 12/19/2006, 19:04:22 PM by Susanfindlay
I have been using Quark since 1990 until recently, when upgraded my computer equipment I opted to buy the Adobe Creative Suite and wasn't prepared to spend the extra on Quark. I am not completely up to speed with Indesign yet, however, I am finding my way round.



For me Quark is a thing of the past.



And Nlizer I am a Mac user and will never change!



Sue
Adobe CC amongst other things

Uploaded files:168 | Total Sales: 1966
Page:
1
 2 >
 of 2
Showing posts 1 - 20 of 30
Current Server Time: 12/24/2014, 21:05:16 PM