A comparison between the two on Earthbound Light does find a difference, but it also seems to explain why it won't make much difference for the majority of photos. My camera (Canon 40D) does have 14-bit capture and I haven't noticed a difference in shadow detail over the one I replaced (Canon 20D) - but given that I can't go back to 12-bit and save file space it is kind of a moot point for me. My take after reading on this subject is that it doesn't make much difference - unless you are seriously pushing exposure multiple stops. I suppose if you do a lot of low light shooting that may be an advantage, but I still think it is a very minor point when deciding on a camera. The bits are wasted on highlight detail (already enough) and noticeable in shadows only when pushed brighter.
I'd be interested to know how many people with the higher end Nikons leave their cameras in 12-bit instead of 14-bit...
How to Design Effective Ads for Mobile Devices
Join our blog contest to win $600 worth of prizes. Share your best practices in designing mobile ads that create engagement and conversion rates.
- Pesky Squirrels
- Tip of the week: mobile images and microstock, oops I forgot my DSLR
- My first artistic nude picture was "accidental"
- 10 Things You Can Shoot Right Now
- Animal Shelter Photography: Sable the senior GSD
- Using Stock Images, Videos, and Music to Create Amazing Short Films on a Budget
- Don't Let Pixel Envy Drag You Down
- Reduce Eyeball Overload by Sticking to These Minimalist Design Tips
Related image searches
Capture related image searches