The Do Nots of Successful Keywords

Over the next week or so, I'll continue a short course in keywording the Dreamstime way. I can't promise that our guide will take all the tedium out of the job but if you follow it, the time you spend in adding data to your images should improve your downloads and the process made smoother.
] ]
Ok, let's admit it. You don't love photography because you love keywording. Keywording can be a dull task and the rewards for good work elusive to document. But, for certain, you won't get many kicks or kudos from poorly keyworded images. Better keywords=more satisfied users=more downloads.
] ]
The point of good keywords is simple: eliminate user frustration and increase downloads. Proof: check out the message boards where Dreamstime contributors tell how their downloads increased once they "fixed" their keywords.
] ]
Dreamstime 'rules' and practices should take some of the guesswork out of entering the image information.
Let's get the ugly part over first. Below are all the Do Nots of creating image information for Dreamstime. The good thing about the Do Nots is that they are things NOT to do and will cut down the time you spend in adding needless information.
FIRST: Don't try to find ALL the words that describe every little thing in the image.
] ]
The picture on the left is obviously of a rooster. It is not an image of lumber just because there are a few pieces of old wood in the far background. Ask yourself, "Would I be happy if I was looking for wood and the search returned a male chicken?" The second image would be closer to what I wanted. You may ask but what if someone wanted a picture of a male chicken with pieces of old wood in the background? I refer that question to Photoshop.
Don't spam. More about that later.
Cut and Paste: Yes. But make certain that the words you cut and paste belong with the subsequent images.
Example: The image on the left below has the keywords silver and belt. The belt is not shown in the next frame. Many of the same keywords will apply to both images but belt and silver will not. Careless cut and paste would include those words in the second image.
] ]
Caution: the most common keywording error is to cut and paste words from one image to a similar one without making certain that the elements are present in the subsequent images.
Did I mention: Don't spam?
Too much information. Poor data can creep in even when you are not cutting and pasting or spamming.
Example: The image on the left below is titled Asian Tourist Taking Pictures. The photographer must have known that the man was Asian but the man's ethnicity is not obvious to the viewer. Leave out any information that you may know but that can't be seen in the image. The second image would be returned in a successful search for those terms. Perhaps the woman isn't a tourist but there is a cruise ship prominent in the background so the assumption is sound.
]]
Don't use the same title for several images like Portrait (1), Portrait (2) etc. Example: Create unique titles for each image in a series in order to have your images scattered about a search. Rather then naming the images below: Brick wall 1, Brick wall 2 and Brick Wall 3 name them: Red Brick wall, Tan brick wall and Grey brick wall
] ]
]
Don't use keywords for something that COULD happen but is not in the image.
] ]
Example: We often see still life images of bottles of wine with the keywords drinking and drunk. If someone drank the wine in the pictures above they might become drunk. But there is no drinking going on. Drinking and drunk are bad keywords for these images and will produce a less than optimum search result.
Don't use opposites as keywords.
A photo of ice crystals should not have the keyword hot. Molten lava should not have the keyword cold.
] ]
Don't label each element of the face in a portrait. Eyes, ears, noses. We all have them. They are in all portraits. Don't use these keywords unless the particular part of the face is prominent in the image.
Example: The image on the left requires the keyword eyes but the one on the right does not.
] ]
Don't name every article of clothing in a full-length shot. All full-length images of people will surely show feet and shoes. But unless the feet are up on a table or prominent in the image, don't use those words Example: In the image below, the keywords shoe and shoes are appropriate only in the image on the right.
] ]
Don't try to guess a possible end usage and add that use to the title or to the keywords ever!
] ]
The images here could be great greeting cards but should not have the keyword greeting or postcard. Leave it to the end user to find an image by searching on what it is a picture of-not of how it might be used. The above images should NOT be labeled with the keywords card or postcard.
Don't use model's name in title nor keywords. You need to protect their privacy.
Remember DON'T SPAM when keywording.
Example: For a tight in shot of a woman from the waist up on a massage table with only the back of the woman's head, her back and a towel covering her to the top of her legs with no one else in the image, the bad keywords were: asia, asian-image had no ethnic identifying characteristics, background-no background in the image and image would not be an appropriate background image, beach, sand-no beach in image, management and business-no business going on as even the business of a spa was not evident, businesslady-misspelled and no way to tell what the woman did as a business or job, businesswoman-ditto, de-stressed-not a word, destressed-mispelled word correct is distressed, experience-because the woman was simply resting there was no experience and nothing to experience, people-only one person in the image and people is covered in the categories, heel sole, sole, toe, toes-feet are not in the image thailand, travel, traveler, travelers, traveling, traveling, travelling-image could have been taken anywhere in the world or even in the woman's home. Not a travel image. The photographer might have traveled to take the image but that isn't information that is available in the image.
To be continued...
Ellen Boughn
View blog View portfolio
  • Ellenboughn
  • Bainbridge Island, United States
I have written a about microstock photography released in 2010. I was the Director of Content at Dreamstime for two years ending in Feb, 2009. You can order my book from amazon via my website at www.ellenboughn.com/blog.

Your comment must be written in English.

We value all opinions and we will not censor or delete comments unless they come from fake accounts or contain spam, threats, false facts or vulgarity.

Asimkhazra

August 14, 2017

Very useful article. Now on I will think afresh about key-warding. Many thanks.

Puddipuddi

August 13, 2017

Thank you I'm going to try this (:

Zokimaster

June 02, 2012

I'm very new here, so I'm not sure if my question is (not) already answered somewhere. For instance, if there would be a photo, taken by someone standing on the top of Mount Everest, showing the panoramic view from the top of this great mountain. Can be keywoard then "view from Mount Everest" or should be keywords "view" and "Mount Everest". Also, if someone is looking for excately this kind of image, then his search for "view from Mount Everest" would probably give a lot of results, all kind of photos with keywords "view" and "Mount Everest". So my question is, can be keywords in form of few words together (like description)? And how excately DT search works - if image has keyword "view from Mount Everest", would DT rate it higher if the search is for "view from Mount Everest" or it would rate it as same important as it rates other let's say 100 images which have also keywords "view" and "Mount Everest"? Can be keyword a whole phrase and how much it helps in search results, to list the image higher in the results?

Stuartkey

July 13, 2008

One thing I have to wonder about is how much attention is really paid to keywords during the review process. I see images on the first page of the "Latest Additions" section that seem to have poor keywording, based on the rules outlined in your blogs. Since they're on the first page of that section and, therefore, are very recently approved, I can only assume that most went through the review process with those keywords. I know it's time consuming, but perhaps DT should review the keywords more closely when an image is first submitted.


Absolutely, 100% agree with that.


Adpower99

July 12, 2008

Thanks, Ellen. Having used the site as both a designer and a photographer, I can see both sides of this. It's very frustrating as a designer to run what seems to be a straigh-forward, simple search and get largely unexpected results because of bad keywording. On the other hand, I understand the desire to make sure your image is described as completely as possible. The balance is delicate and sometimes difficult to achieve.

One thing I have to wonder about is how much attention is really paid to keywords during the review process. I see images on the first page of the "Latest Additions" section that seem to have poor keywording, based on the rules outlined in your blogs. Since they're on the first page of that section and, therefore, are very recently approved, I can only assume that most went through the review process with those keywords. I know it's time consuming, but perhaps DT should review the keywords more closely when an image is first submitted.

Jaboardm

July 10, 2008

Learning still hasn't come to an end... Thanks, you are covering some of the errors I have been making...

Linqong

July 06, 2008

Very good article, very helpful to me!

Titania1980

July 04, 2008

thank you!! It's very useful
I'm re checking my pics and fixing keywords mistakes, bad keywords, etc

I tend to put a lot of keywords because I use to feel that pics won't be found fith few keywords :S can you tell me if this is true?? thanks!!

J0yce

July 03, 2008

Some good things to check out in my older images before I knew what the heck I was doing. :D Thanks for the reminder.

Showpup

July 03, 2008

Thank you for taking the time to list and demonstrate all these for us. It is very much appreciated. I'm just now getting ready to begin uploading my first photography submissions.

Agathabrown

January 23, 2008

what a great article. im only new to stock photography so its really good to see "real life" examples in front of me, even for the "do-nots"... now on to the "do's"

Amydunn

December 19, 2007

Keywording's the most difficult part of microstock, that's for sure. Thanks for this helpful article. I'll certainly use the concepts here moving forward.

Wlablack

October 28, 2007

Thank you, Ellen. I read carefully. and i understand the concept of re-keywording the image. i also know the relevancy of keywording and i know that keywording is an important part of our job

Asthedreamers

October 20, 2007

This gives me a little more motivation for keywords. But man it's still so hard. I always rush the process and probably mess up a couple.

0tvalo

August 31, 2007

I think most of us are guilty of rushing the keywording process - especially with cutting and pasting. The article is a great reminder of how important it is. It's nicely written with good examples. Thanks!

Ellenboughn

August 18, 2007

that's certain

Ellenboughn

August 17, 2007

It's a very useful article, thank you! When I only begun working with stocks, I had some problems with keywording. I hope I've improved my skills in writing keywords by now. I'll be waiting for your new articles!
Be ceertain to read all three of the keywording articles...

Natie

August 17, 2007

It's a very useful article, thank you! When I only begun working with stocks, I had some problems with keywording. I hope I've improved my skills in writing keywords by now. I'll be waiting for your new articles!

Kuanchong

August 16, 2007

good article! worth of time to read.

Thank you very much..

Kenneystudios

August 16, 2007

Very helpful! Thank you! I look forward to many more articles about keywords! While I can take hundreds of photographs in a day, it can take me days just to property keyword one image, or a series of similar images! The more hints and tips, the better! Keep'em comin'!