Keywords, what a nuisance!
Well, it has been fun, I admit, reading whatever you chose there to keyword your images with but then I thought: what are those people thinking? Don't they wanna sell their images? Or they just throw the image, cross their fingers and pray to God someone will want apples and type strawberries by accident to find their apple images? That is a serious “disease” trust me: to write all fruits and vegetables when you have only one or two, to write all animals on earth when you have one poor lion – if I am lucky, I will find only the feline class :) - to write all surrounding cities or islands when there is one specific city and one specific island.
I am aware that there are people who do not know English well enough to keyword themselves, I am sure however that 90% of the contributors know enough English to provide a 10 words minimum for their images. Yes, it may be time-consuming and daunting especially when you have tons of images. I do not know about you but I would definitely not want something of mine go live or online until it has been satisfactorily keyworded. It would surely not be me – I am very strict when delivering pieces of writing! and also because my interest would be to sell. And yes, because I am such a nice person :P and do not want other users to feel frustrated or calling me names when finding let's say my summer in the winter images section. This does not mean I called you names when I found cans instead of eggs :P.
I would like to appeal to your poor "conscience" and that little being living somewhere inside your tiny heads and consider this logically: You all respect and admire your own “creations,” you know how much you have worked for them, your efforts and time invested so why ruin it at the end, only one step away from the coastline? We have a saying here: “you drown five feet from shoreline”.
Enough with the preamble and scolding and let's get to business. I will start outlining certain facts which have drawn my attention and which can be used by you when keywording:
First and foremost, I for one warmly recommend Ellen's articles on keywording must read this and this and this as they are excellent guidelines. You really need to be aware that there are differences in keywording among agencies and what works for one may not be good for the other. Read them and stop whining because learning has never harmed anyone. Stop pouting and start learning! Take it as an assignment: This is what it takes for your business! It will do favors to no one but you........and I will lose my source of entertainment, sure, but won't regret it much!
Second, do not think of copying or cheating. It is not nice........okay that is irrelevant :P! Or at least if you copy, make sure that you keep only what is relevant. A minimum itsty bitsy tiny effort to go quickly through what you have taken and decide what works for you or not. It may reduce the number of your keywords but who told you that you need hundreds and hundreds of keywords to accompany your image? Your image's chances of being found increase with good title, good description and relevant keywords, not hundreds of irrelevancies. There are nevertheless images which allow lots of keywords – expressions, people see link. Make sure the “delirium” does not go astray! Your lined up glasses are not a business deal concept they are at the most a party, celebration, wedding, gathering. Same goes for concepts and metaphors.
The title should be short, attractive, catchy or purely descriptive, depending on where you want people to find your image. I have a colleague with whom I had a heated debate on whether to name his image “Spring diva” or “Woman's green eyes behind leaves”. Of course the first title sounds more attractive and interesting but then I asked him where would you like people to find your image or how? He finally kept his version of Spring Diva. I am for more descriptive titles but I am also sure that there are searches on metaphors not to mention conceptual titles. Regarding concepts and metaphors, I know that you usually tend to see there more than it is. Remember that you do not frame the image and hang it on your wall and tell your guests : “This is a woman's shape” when you actually have an orange. You upload your image on a stock site and hope to sell. Make sure if your title is metaphorical or conceptual it has relevancy for what is actually in the image.
The same goes for the description. Here you are allowed to write more indeed but please do not write encyclopedias. Stick to the descriptive: What exactly do I see in the image and is large enough to be visible or to strike the eye? How is it related to the title? Locations allow for extra information such as very brief history, if you really want to. I have encountered one page descriptions of places in which I was introduced to the whole history of the place.......OK, educating, but how does this help? My description needs to contain exactly the words i want people to search for: Empty/Deserted coastline of Baltic Sea bathed by warm sunset light.
And enough for today! I do have dozens of such examples, adapted and invented of course but with a true basis......I would not dare to invent too much, nor lie about my inspirational sources.
Camera equipment: New and Old
- Camera equipment: New and Old
- Our Photos: Monuments of the Past
- Tip of the week. How to guide and direct your model during the photoshoot
- Stock Photography - Who buys Your Stock Images?
- Great changes to photography are happening as we speak
- Is pro photography going away??
- Hagia Sophia, Istanbul (Traveling Turkey Series - 1)
- Stock Photography - How to sell your images