The raw workflow

For those who haven't yet appreciated the benefit of RAW format I advise to take a close examination of the argument. I am one that in my first year and half in microstock shooted just plain jpegs. Then find out that shooting in RAW and including it into my post-processing workflow was something incredibly useful.

Since then I haven't looked back anymore (jpeg what? :-) and I assure you that my acceptance ratio was improving enormously.

RAW format allow you to better correct, not only the usual mistakes (blown highlights or undersposure), but especially noise and sharpen your images as you can only dream after the image has been processed by the camera and output in jpeg or tiff format.

Here you can find some useful articles about raw image processing:

© Rjmiz

Photo credits: Datrendydesign, Richie Lomba, Anthony Furgison, Saniphoto.

Your article must be written in English

April 24, 2009


Hi Angela,
Thank for your comment. I wish you to have soon your dream coming true! :-)
have a nice creative day!

April 23, 2009


I look forward to having a new camera wit raw capabilities! Thanks for your useful and inspirational article!

March 26, 2009


Yes, the drawback of the raw+jpg option is that it requires a HUGE memory card... (I've got a Nikon D300 too, with 8 GB cf cards...). D300's jpgs are often great! Expecially if you shoot in A mode with EV down to -0,3 or -0,7 (camera tends a little bit to overexpose, imho).

March 26, 2009


Thank you Aughty, for your comment. Glad it was useful for you. We are here at DT to share knowledge and friendship! :-)

March 26, 2009


hello Azatoth973,
thank you for your input. I have not experienced this system (is not taking away too much of memory card space, after all?) and cannot tell if is better or worse. I suppose everybody will find and use what is best for his own workflow pace. Mine is pretty slow! :-) so I suppose for me is good the 'raw only' solution .-)

March 26, 2009


I agree, raw file is often far more flexible and better than simple jpg... But sometimes the cam-jpgs are very good too, and quick (no slow workflow required...), so I believe that the best way is to use the "Raw + Jpg" option in the cam settings... if the Jpg is good enough, you can use it quickly without the usual slow and annoying workflow (sharpening, denoising, conversion ecc...). Some cams often generate extremely good jpgs with the proper settings and the proper exposure, even at high ISOs.

March 25, 2009


Thanks for sharing this. I'm a strong believer too in the power of RAW.

Related image searches
Quality related image searches
To provide you with additional information about how we collect and use your personal data, we've recently updated our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. Please review these pages now, as they apply to your continued use of our website.