Scanning for stock

I have managed to get an image accepted that is scanned from some of my old slides. I lived for a year in Bangladesh and took quite a lot of photos there, as well as during some travels in India. Scanning is a little frustrating as you have to deal with a number of issues:

1. Dust and scratches. Hopefully there aren't scratches, but all the blowing in the world seems to leave a few particles behind that you need to take care of.

2. Color balance. Colors fade at different rates so the older the slide the more you need to handle color cast. I find my slides tend towards blue.

3. Grain. You can't get away from grain, but I find it is difficult to get good sharpness without enhancing the grain that is present.

4. Technique. There are a lot of variables to consider. You can use all kinds of automated tools with my scanner including curves and other corrections that can also be applied in Photoshop. You must decide to apply them in the scan (which saves time) or later in Photoshop for more control.

5. Poor camera technique. I have grown in leaps and bounds since going digital. One of the bigs things I took some time to figure out early on is the lowest speed I can handhold at. I notice when scanning old images from film that I used to get quite a bit more camera shake 10 years ago...

My scanner is a Minolta DImage IV, which I don't think you can buy anymore. Fortunately it still works on my computer, but I haven't found any updated drivers and haven't been able to get it working on any other computer. It does a great job and is much, much better than a flatbed I tried before it. It uses a 4 slide cartridge or 6 image negative holder. You cannot scan anything else with it...

We'll see how this image does. I suspect I'm better off taking new shots than going through old slides :)

Photo credits: Brad Calkins.

Your article must be written in English

Publish
December 22, 2008

Bradcalkins

My first camera was a Canon AE-1, Reed! I got it new in 1985 - I loved that camera.

There is definitely a different look to digital - much smoother. I just haven't found the speed of doing a scan to be anything close to the speed you can turn around an image if you shoot digital in the first place. I've dabbled with a few more since i wrote this, but haven't sold any scans yet.

December 22, 2008

Reeddaigle

Thanks for the Newbies blog entries. I just read the Tips for Newbies II entry, and I think I'll use some of the advice.
So far, my entire portfolio on Dreamstime is from scanned negs and slides. I'm still shooting film, actually. But I'll soon purchase a Canon DSLR. My biggest problem with photos being accepted has been noise or grain. And many of my scanned images have many "artifacts" or pixellated areas that are much too time consuming to fix. I'm not sure that they're worth the time to fix. And as Macdaddy has said, I prefer to do the work manually. I've found that the only auto features that work well with my scanner are the low setting of dust removal. Ah well, soon I'll have a much quicker process.

October 01, 2008

Yuris

I have one or two pictures in my portfolio here which were scanned from slides. One of these pictures is a very good seller - my bestseller here:
Ice and Sun
The picture was published many times in books and magazines.
It is very nice that DS admits such pictures unlike other agencies.

October 01, 2008

Emicristea

On the step 3, i try to get away the grain only from the sky and clouds, with selective selection in Photoshop and a noise removal filter.
Where is detail, i let the grain if is not very hard.

Related image searches
Film related image searches