They Say Pocket Digital Cameras Are No Good For Stock

I've seen a post or two from people saying how difficult it is to get images accepted with low end cameras. Your ability with what you can do may be limited, but the truth is, low-end cameras take excellent pictures. There are a few of you out there where photography is in your blood, you're always out taking pictures, but you just don't have the means to purchase a good SLR. You've tried submitting images but keep getting rejections for quality issues. It could be that you've just never learned one little trick that I've learned.

All the images in my portfolio were taken with a Nikon D100. That is, all but one. That one image was taken with a pocket digital camera that I purchased in 2004. You don't need to be a technology guru to know a low-end digital camera from 2004 is like rubbing two sticks together to start a fire. If that's the case, then how did the image get accepted and become one of my better selling images in my small-but-growing portfolio?

As I used the camera, I noticed a lot of the images were always a little blurry or seemed a bit out of focus. At the same time, other pictures came out clear and sharp. If I could get good images, then why wasn't I always getting good images?

It finally dawned on me one day when I was taking some snapshots. A pocket camera is small and light; any movement of your hand while taking a picture can cause blurring. It's a natural reflex to move your whole hand when pushing the shutter button. I began to be conscious of what I was doing and would hold the camera as steady as possible and moving the finger only when I pressed the button. As a result, I had a lot less problems with image quality.

When I get rejections they generally are canned messages; most points of the message don't make sense and/or do not apply but one of the statements will be the most likely reason for the rejection. I'm betting that those who have been using pocket cameras and get rejections for noise or focus, it's not because of those reasons, it's because the camera was slightly shaken or moving when the image was taken. A very slight blur from movement can be mistaken for noise or focus.

Just learning to hold the camera steady when taking the picture will solve the problem if the real issue is camera movement. You can also shop around for table-top tripods and monopods that will cost $10-$20.

You're still going to get noisy images if you use the optical zoom. You will be limited with light issues. Your hands are tied in many different ways when it comes to taking stock images with a pocket camera. But that shouldn't stop those who are new and starting from scratch in photography from getting into the stock game because pocket digital cameras do take wonderful images. Many times the trick is merely to squeeze the shutter button while holding the camera still instead of pushing the entire camera along with the button. It doesn't take much movement to make an image that looks fine unsuitable for stock.

The image shown here is the picture in my portfolio taken with a pocket camera. It recently had a nice TIFF sale which makes it one of my best images in my portfolio in terms of revenue. Like I said, those low-end cameras do take wonderful pictures. But I started getting nice results only after I realized I was the main reason for poor image quality. The problem wasn't the camera!

21 Comments

You have to be logged in to comment.

Your article must be written in English

Publish
March 10, 2010

Xiaofeng123

I can not agree more.I think the people's brain is the most important.Not the camera.

March 07, 2010

Jayv

you are right its techniques that prevails over technology.

March 07, 2010

Tan510jomast

aside from the sensor, and the ease to upsize for any clients who require billboard size images, i have seen some images taken with PnS that will knock the socks of many who have taken with top of the line DSLR.
i suppose like many things, the results within limits depend on the workman not the tools. we "pros" used top of the line pro cameras only because of the mileage we put on our cameras; not because we "can only make pro pictures with pro cameras".. as one jolly camera commission salesman used to preach, lol.
then too, there are times you won't want to bring your top of the line camera .
eg. when i was in Tunisia riding on a drumadery through the sahara where sand sweep your face like breeze in the mountains, i had then a consumer DSLR with me. i worry then having to shoot with one hand thinking if i fall, it won't be just my camera who would be broken.
i will return to the sahara again one day, hopefully, InchAllah (God willing) as the tunisiennes say. when i do,...

February 25, 2010

Scottysally2

I found this article very interesting, as I have a Canon G11, I usually have it set at ISO 100, and also have a problem with movement unless I use a tripod. Must try ISO 80 for less noise. Thank you for sharing.

February 19, 2010

Eclecticelegance

All my photos are taken with a Sony Cybershot 7.0 megapixel digital pocket camera from 2007. :) It is possible!!

February 18, 2010

Afagundes

Another reason for camera shake in point and shoot cameras is that it takes a while to take the picture unlike the DSLRS wich are almost instantly doing it.
Many people simply dont wait and start moving before the camera took the picture, therefore, shaky pictures.

February 15, 2010

Rennaesp

well said! thanks for the tip, my best selling image is also with a pocket camera, it took great pictures under the right conditions and settings

February 14, 2010

Calyx22

I agree about pocket cameras taking commercially viable pictures. Many of the photos in my portfolio were taken with a Nikon Coolpix P2, including my best selling image to date. You do have to be aware of the limitations of the camera, and I cannot use the optical zoom at ALL. What a great article!

February 13, 2010

Vclements

" I realized I was the main reason for poor image quality. The problem wasn't the camera'
A real photographer can create images with a $50 camera just the same as a $30,000 camera. The camera is just a tool.

February 13, 2010

Countedsorrow2

I have a fabulous Film SLR but can't afford a good DSLR just yet.
(Plus i still love film too much)

All my dreamstime pics are taken on my 4 year old kodak pocket didgital camera.

The problems I encounteer is noise at high ISO and camera shake. So you just work within the limitations of your camera and you can take as sharp an image as the next gal! (or guy) :)

PS This camera has taken quite a beating - it was once accidentally rolled up in a picnic blanket, when we shook the blanket out the camera came flying out, bounced down our cement driveway and across onto the tar road and the back came off.

I picked up the pieces, screwed it back together, and it still works a dream!
I don't think my SLR could take that... :) (I don't recommend it though)

Cheers, Kristy

February 12, 2010

iportret

Excellent post!

February 12, 2010

Adeliepenguin

I agree, camera shake is a big problem. My point and shoot allows me to adjust the shutter speed, so I always make it as fast as the light will allow, if I am not on a tripod. Or, another alternative, for cameras that have a setting for sports, use the sports setting when possible. (Sports settings should incorporate a faster shutter speed.) Another tip...some point and shoot cameras are great for macros. My mom's point and shoot can focus at 2 inches at the macro setting, which offers amazing wider angle possibilities than my macro lens on my SLR.

February 12, 2010

Thefinalmiracle

You are right about the drawbacks of a pocket camera, but it has one damn advantage. It fits in your pocket. My best selling images are not studio shots taken with / without slr, but shots taken from my pocket camera when I possibly wouldn't have a SLR with me!

February 12, 2010

Studioportosabbia

Great blog! When I bought my second digital compact I discoverd the world of microstock so I started this "career" with a Canon Ixus. Some sites accepted those images, others didn't. I still have them online and they are still selling. After quality it's also the composition that counts and I've seen many compact photographers taking excellent pictures with compacts.

February 12, 2010

Marekuliasz

You can try to use a 2 second self timer to avoid shaking the camera when pressing a shutter button. Of course, supporting camera against anything solid would help too.

I am using compact waterproof Pentax Optio Wxx cameras for paddling. I have a few pictures from them in my stock photo. However, in my case, a noise is a major problem. These cameras are waterproof, but not the best P&S available.

Some time ago I wrote "10 Tips How to Avoid Blurry Pictures when Shooting from a Kayak" in my Paddling with a Camera blog.

February 12, 2010

Asyan

For me, the biggest problem that I had with my compact camera was removing the lens fringing effect (due to poor quality lens), off course, setting my camera to a lower ISO (I use ISO 80) is a must, but I don't always use a tripod...anyway is a useful article and a nice image, thanks for sharing!

February 12, 2010

Mani33

I don't know if that will help me much as the reason of my rejections usually the week lens! I will try not shaking the cam... thanks for sharing!
Your image is great! :)

February 12, 2010

Cristalloid

I agree with wisconsinart. In my opinion there is another point that may be important. Digital compact camera have smaller sensors than DSLRs, therefor images made with them have more noise, especially with higher ISOs. With my Canon powershot G10 I only shoot in ISO 80 or ISO 100 to get not to noisy pictures. For me that does work because I only use this cam on outdoor tours when the light is clear and bright.

February 12, 2010

Keki

so very true! thanks for the reminder! :)

February 12, 2010

Frantab01

fantastic, great blog - i've got a few images taken with my pocket camera accepted - will def take note of what you've said when i next use it - thanks alot :)

February 12, 2010

Wildmac

Excellent article! Cheers Carol :)

Related image searches

Digital related image searches

This article has been read 2926 times. Photo credits: Wisconsinart.