To provide you with additional information about how we collect and use your personal data, we've recently updated our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. Please review these pages now, as they apply to your continued use of our website.

To Flickr? Not To Flickr?

I have noticed that many of my fellows Dreamstimes members maintain active Flickr sites. I've enjoyed looking through those, and have gotten lots of great inspiration from the photos.

I'm wrestling with the idea of creating my own Flickr site. I see a couple pros, and a couple cons.

On the positive side, I can see that sharing photos is (almost) always satisfying. Once the shots are on Flickr, it's no work at all to get them to clients, family, friends. . .

I have a sense that Flickr offers a lot of community features, too, many ways to find photographers with similar interests.

Finally, unless I'm wrong, it's free.

On the other hand:

I use Apple's Aperture and my .mac account to create and share web galleries. I'm pretty happy with the integration between Aperture and the web galleries. Publishing is simple, the images are high quality (or at least as high quality as I can make them!). The galleries are semi-public in that they are open to all, but their addresses are just about impossible to stumble across accidentally.

But Aperture has no community features, and .mac does cost $99/year (not to mention the cost of Aperture itself).

And, specific method of web-sharing aside, I'm puzzled by the impact of web availability on sales. If images are available publicly, does that inspire viewers to hustle over to Dreamstimes to purchase? Or does it inspire people to just download from Flickr (or wherever) and thus undercut sales?

As always, I am eager to hear from others on this. What has your experience been, pro and/or con? Any comments would be appreciated!

Photo credits: Charles Sichel-outcalt.

Your article must be written in English

Publish
January 25, 2008

Sebcz

The way I run my flickr account is this: I take a photo, downsize it, provide a watermark (sometimes two), and I add a link to Dreamstime. I refrain from publishing EVERY photo available on DT, just one from a series to be an example of what can be expected on DT. See my flick profile: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sebcz/

January 24, 2008

Cleaper

Thanks Charles!

Just had my first two approved..Yay!

C

January 24, 2008

Cleaper

Thanks Charles!

Just had my first two approved..Yay!

C

January 22, 2008

Fotogeek

Hi Charles,

Just upload watermarked web resolution pics on Flickr and that should keep you safe from theft. In the comment you can direct the viewers to your DT account to buy the high res pics to print them themselves.
That is what I plan to do, but so far not done due to lack of time. However, I have started to be picky about what I post on Flickr lately.
Hope this helped.

Related image searches
Blog related image searches