To provide you with additional information about how we collect and use your personal data, we've recently updated our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. Please review these pages now, as they apply to your continued use of our website.

which is better,simple or complicated?

As a newbie, I was told the microstock website needs simple elements more than a well decorated by some tools such as photoshop.

According to my experience, the view I mentioned about is obviously outdated. I found some well decorated pictures have extremely sales records, meanwhile those simple elements pictures has fewer views and sales records, some even stoped by the editors by using the excuse "This is a very well covered subject in our data base or the subject of your image is too specific."

So I think simple elements pictures are no longer the best sorts to be uploaded into your portfolio, the best way is to combine your simple elements pictures into one or just PS them into some unique style or special color. Just change, in a word.

What do you think, my friend, hope to hear more advices.

© Bowie15 ( Help)
© Iofoto ( Help)

Photo credits: , Bowie15, Christopher Nuzzaco, Iofoto.

Your article must be written in English

Publish
June 01, 2009

Fultonsphoto

I think there is a market for both, as to which is the better market at any given time is the best way to judge if you can what types of images to produce...

May 31, 2009

Rebeccaosborn

i have to agree with the below, simple photos and illustrations are of course easier to create, and so probably someone has done it already!!!

May 30, 2009

Bradcalkins

Simple elements are important to a stock site, but become quickly saturated as more people have access to the 'easy' elements...

Related image searches
Element related image searches