Which to shoot RAW or JPEG?

© Aughty
Since shooting stock for DT, I have been on a learning curve. Learning about ISO, DOF, Dynamic Range, Histograms and tons of other fun stuff that makes me feel more like a technician of imagery than a photographer. I deal with reality (photography) first and that’s to capture the image creatively, after that reality ends and technology begins.

This latest curve for me is compression of files. DSLR cameras store files in two formats: Lossless Compression and Lossy Compression. OK, that’s it that’s all I need to know, how easier can that be to pick the right file format for my images? Who wants lossy compressions? Well becoming the wizard of technology I have to know what that means in digital numbers. That’s what we have become, right, accounting photographers, having to keep track of all the numbers associated with the digital photography.

When I capture an image on a sensor it is processed and sent to the memory card. How much image data I keep and save to my memory card depends on how the DSLR formats my files. The more data I keep the more numbers to store and that means more space needed to store the captured images. I use 4G memory cards with a buffer to keep up with storage. I do keep a few memory cards in my bag so I will never run out of memory.

The two file formats I have to choose from are either RAW and JPEG.

1) RAW a Lossless Compression format. RAW captures everything the senor sees and loses no data, giving me more flexibility over the finished image. RAW files normally hold 14-bit or more of color information for post-processing and therefore the files are rather on the large size. RAW files have more information then JPEG files, but this does not eliminate noise. Most noise is generated after the image is captured by the camera’s senor and is being transfer to the memory card.

RAW files are unprocessed by the DSLR while the JPEG is corrected for image tone, color, sharpness, and WB all before saving it to memory card. With RAW files I can control all these corrections after downloading to computer.

RAW files are converted by software to either TIFF or JPEG. The TIFF file is a lossless compression file that can be opened and edit numerous times without loss to the original contents of the file. The DSLR camera manufacture includes software for converting RAW into TIFF OR JPEG files suitable for editing.

© Aughty
2) JPEG a Lossy Compression format. JPEG files are normally 8-bit of color information and do not require post-processing for printing from. JPEG will lose some quality but requires no post-processing like RAW files. But will gain some noise over the RAW because of the downsizing of the file from 14-bit to 8-bit as well as the corrections to the image. JPEG files discard information each time the file is opened, edited and saved.

© Aughty
Each has its place in my capturing of images, but it’s nice to know what my choices are. I have chosen to do both RAW and JPEG since my camera has that feature and it's faster to review the JPEG files on my computers.

Photo credits: , Aughty Venable.

Your article must be written in English

February 10, 2009


I agree, only shoot in RAW.
There used to be a time when the largest card was 512mb, but right now that is no issue anymore and the prices of the cards went downhill so why NOT shoot in RAW is the question ?


February 10, 2009


For ordinary pictures (family album, holidays...) Jpeg is more immediate, as you souldn't have to work in postproduction (exception made eventually for levels or contrast balance).
But if you want "professional" results in terms of quality, or if you want to use your images for commercial purposes, RAW is a must. Actually it gives you a number of advantages, such as:
1. Regulation of different parameters (i.e.: exposure, color mode, contrast, sharpening...) without affecting the resolution quality;
2. Not invasive post production processes (i.e.: the application of a digital filter);
3. It is a sort of negative and therefore it is also use to demonstrate the property of an image.

So I recommend to use RAW format, even if you should spend a bit of time in post production.

Have a nice day!

February 10, 2009


I also only shoot RAW - while I understand the convenience of shooting JPG, RAW just gives you that much more flexibility in applying tone curves etc. to suit the image, rather than being stuck with what the camera was programed with.

I also find that by shooting RAW, there's less to worry about when shooting - as long as you concentrate on the exposure, composition and focus, everything else can then be taken care of in post processing.

February 09, 2009


Only raw)
I am recommend shot only in raw format)

December 05, 2008


I think it's ALWAYS recommended to shoot Raw... if they are well processed, the results can be far...FAR better than the in-cam JPGs... If you do some errors in the jpg with exposition, or you get too much sharpening or too much noise, it can be very difficult (or impossibile... ) to correct them without getting a mess of artifacts... Raw processing produces much better results even if it can be painfully slow and difficult (yes : you must be ALSO a technician... ).
In some situations in cam jpgs can be more "quick" to obtain and can be very good (or at least acceptable) ...so, shooting RAW+JPG can be a good choice even if there's a storage space problem (you will need AT LEAST a 4 GB memory card... )

Related image searches
Compression related image searches