Why don't increase the level of subscription?

I think that the price of selling in DT should be reviewed by management. For example, my last 20 picture sold just 4 are with credits and 16 (!!) are with subscriptions at 0.42$ each

I can comprehend that we earn on volume and not on the single picture sold, but I think that most of use of these picture are for blog or internet so people buy just small size.

The cost and the the effort to shot original picture (and the effort also to improve the skills in PS for example) have a value more than 0.42$ per picture.

My numbers of sells are increasing constantly but my earning are going down fast.

What's your opinion?

Your article must be written in English

Publish
September 27, 2013

Andrews71

what does it means?

September 26, 2013

Peanutroaster

Nothing new here and yet people still come to the party.

September 26, 2013

Andrews71

Also 0.00000000000001 > 0 but when you get a job for 1$/hour for your professional support I think that something is wrong

September 25, 2013

Maocheng

0.42 > 0

September 25, 2013

Egomezta

All sells add, but yes sometimes is frustrating, my average RPD is $1.96

September 24, 2013

Marianvejcik

I'm starting to get frustrated, because I also have 12 sales in a row a sub.

September 23, 2013

Andrews71

Yes, correct. Then, we need to add the value of the camera, lenses, travel, time to work them...I think that is not acceptable...

September 22, 2013

Physi28

I understand your concern, personally what I find somewhat frustrating is that a picture which is currently on level 5 can still give a revenue of only 0.40 $!
Much is this month the RPD has improved in my case, in general the trend is to stay at around 1$ average per image.

Related image searches

Credit related image searches

Photo credits: Andrea La Corte.