You have to login first in order to be able to post messages.
Click here to login or register if you are a new user.
New article posted:
Pancake 40 STM, Cokin P Filters, Canon 300X....
Posted: 10/03/2012, 05:12:54 AM
I've got one additional RAW format for one pic so far, but haven't sold it yet. Selling a RAW file seems to be an interesting income for a contributor, but is also expensive for a buyer.
If we would know how big the part of sold RAWs is for DT, we could reconsider this (a little time-consuming) option for all our uploaded files.
Let's see what other contributors have to say.
Canon 5D MkII
Posted: 10/03/2012, 06:31:10 AM
So far I haven't even tried to upload RAW's - so thanks for asking Alexandra and I too am looking forward for answers on this :)
Nikon D700 with Nikkor's, Nikon 90x, Leica X2, Canon S100
Posted: 10/03/2012, 06:42:01 AM
Your choices are up to you, but I will never sell my raw files.
They are the proof that I own the copyright of my images.
And it feels like a potter selling the clay instead of the pots.
Posted: 10/03/2012, 08:02:19 AM
I have uploaded a few RAW files and then stopped completely for the exact reasons given. They are the proof that you took the photograph.
Sigma 17-50 f2.8
Canon 24-70L f2.8
Canon 70-200L f4
Posted: 10/03/2012, 12:34:14 PM
Good point. thank you!
Canon 5D MkII
Posted: 10/03/2012, 14:05:58 PM
I would like to know this answer too! does having a raw format help sell an image? who is getting a better sale out of it? I have uploaded at least a dozen raw files, but never sold one yet. inquiring minds want to know!
Nikon D70 and nikon 5100
Posted: 10/03/2012, 15:36:59 PM
I have been uploading RAW files without selling any. After reading this, I may stop.
Cameras, lenses, phone, eyes, feet and a car.
Posted: 10/06/2012, 14:40:53 PM
Many thanks - this has answered my question. Was going to spend some time today uploading RAW files but think I will do something else instead! Regards
Posted: 06/22/2013, 02:22:19 AM