Frankly, I'd cut out some of the keywords on this image (I didn't look at the other two).
architecture arizona arrival brick building business city commuter departure depot design destinations electric flagstaff green high-speed historic historical history horizontal industrial industry interior landmark metal modern old parking passenger platform rail railroad railway red restored retro road sight speed station style technology terminal tourism tourist train trains transit transport transportation travel usa victorian-architecture voyage
I'd get rid of business (overused, if you search on business you would not expect to get an image of a historic train station), city (this isn't a pic of a city), industrial, industry, interior (this is an exterior), metal (what is metal - is metal an important part of the image), modern (I thought this was victorian which is not modern), parking, road, sight, speed, technology, voyage (associated with the ocean). Also you have a hypenated word and DT doesn't recognize hypens in the way you think. Just a few suggestions, but title and description are important and the fewer "extra" keywords the better.
Hi, Red.... the image you posted was accepted. The one they did not accept is not showing in my portfolio at all. Its a photo of a motel sign isolated on a blue sky. Thanks for the suggestions though!!
Miraclemoments...thank you ! I will keep uploading. The learning process is interesting and very different than fine art photography!
Many keywords are ok if they are relevant. This from an admin -
"Keywording must respect the content of the image. It must be as precise as possible, spot-on, so to speak. Don't over-fill with keywords that are either irrelevant or too concept oriented in-spite of real visual content. On the other hand, try to think and re-think, try to look at that image at least two different times, from as many perspectives, so that you get a more comprehensive set of keywords, so that you don't miss or omit keywords that are actually essential."
Astormfr ... thanks for the feedback. I do have other images in the review process, the one that I was needing feedback on cant be viewed I guess. I try to put myself in the developer's shoes when I keyword and include everything that may be relevant. What is relevant for one designer may not be relevant for another. I've seen developers buy an image only for a small cropped portion of a lamp post and part of a building :)
From my understanding, the more keywords you have the lower the weight that is given to each of those keywords. Yes, you'll be found in more searches, but you may not be placed as high in the search engine for a search that only uses a couple of those words. You might find this interview with Dreamstime admin Carmen Pietraru (aka "Tangie") interesting to watch. In it, she discusses keywording, use of titles, and writing descriptions for Dreamstime. The interview is several years old, but it still may be rather useful.
Enigmacyper....great, thank you! I have found that each agency is different with regard to how they want their keywording done. I tried only 2-3 main keywords at first and the images did not even show up on the search. Then I tried a few more relavent keywords and my views got better.
It's definitely a balancing act. You have to find what works best for you, and you may find that it varies from image to image (or theme to theme). 2-3 keywords is probably too few for any image (I think they recommend at least 10 and closer to 20-30). 50 is probably too many for almost all images (but again, there are likely exceptions).
Also, keep in mind that Dreamstime's search engines take a few days to get updated, so you won't be able to see the changes in placement immediately. In most cases, images won't even show up in the engine at all for about 3 or so days after approval.